This reverts the revert commit bc67fc97c39628c76a4dbca411b0e8a9bfaf726a,
except for the changes in BaseConfigLoader.cpp, which caused the bug
that made us revert 72cf2bdb87f09deff22e1085de3290126aa4ad05. PR 12917
contains an improved change to BaseConfigLoader.cpp, which can be merged
(or rejected) independently.

A few changes have also been made based on review comments.

Otherwise, outdated symbol names will remain.

There were three distinct mechanisms for signaling breakpoint changes in DolphinQt, and the wiring had room for improvement. The behavior of these signals has been consolidated into the new `Host::PPCBreakpointsChanged` signal, which can be emitted from anywhere in DolphinQt to properly update breakpoints everywhere in DolphinQt.

This improves a few things:
- For the `CodeViewWidget` and `MemoryViewWidget`, signals no longer need to propagate through the `CodeWidget` and `MemoryWidget` (respectively) to reach their destination (incoming or outgoing).
- For the `BreakpointWidget`, by self-triggering from its own signal, it no longer must manually call `Update()` after all of the emission sites.
- For the `BranchWatchDialog`, it now has one less thing it must go through the `CodeWidget` for, which is a plus.

Previously, breakpoints would move to the end of the list whenever
they were edited.

Debugger: Various fixes

Co-Authored-By: TryTwo <10532806+TryTwo@users.noreply.github.com>

It works perfectly fine, so why not? Also, consistency with CodeViewWidget.

Before:
1. In theory there could be multiple, but in practice they were (manually) cleared before creating one
2. (Some of) the conditions to clear one were either to reach it, to create a new one (due to the point above), or to step. This created weird behavior: let's say you Step Over a `bl` (thus creating a temporary breakpoint on `pc+4`), and you reached a regular breakpoint inside the `bl`. The temporary one would still be there: if you resumed, the emulation would still stop there, as a sort of Step Out. But, if before resuming, you made a Step, then it wouldn't do that.
3. The breakpoint widget had no idea concept of them, and will treat them as regular breakpoints. Also, they'll be shown only when the widget is updated in some other way, leading to more confusion.
4. Because only one breakpoint could exist per address, the creation of a temporary breakpoint on a top of a regular one would delete it and inherit its properties (e.g. being log-only). This could happen, for instance, if you Stepped Over a `bl` specifically, and pc+4 had a regular breakpoint.

Now there can only be one temporary breakpoint, which is automatically cleared whenever emulation is paused. So, removing some manual clearing from 1., and removing the weird behavior of 2. As it is stored in a separate variable, it won't be seen at all depending on the function used (fixing 3., and removing some checks in other places), and it won't replace a regular breakpoint, instead simply having priority (fixing 4.).

Reuse more code, change misleading names, remove useless documentation, add useful documentation