From 684b3dfd4a2053ff4afe6ace8c09105afd3a0eab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: JosJuice Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 14:18:49 +0100 Subject: JitArm64: Don't fall back to interpreter on low DCBZ hack I missed this in 16eb188f1d. --- Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Source/Core') diff --git a/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp b/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp index 1d8d3d1898..06d8d65b95 100644 --- a/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp +++ b/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp @@ -939,7 +939,6 @@ void JitArm64::dcbz(UGeckoInstruction inst) { INSTRUCTION_START JITDISABLE(bJITLoadStoreOff); - FALLBACK_IF(m_low_dcbz_hack); int a = inst.RA, b = inst.RB; -- cgit v1.2.3